Obama's terrorism speech:
Our export of terror continues.
"What should be beyond
dispute, at this
point, is that Obama's
speeches have very
little to do with Obama's
actions, except to the
extent that they often
signal what he intends not to do.
How many times does Obama
have to deliver a speech
embracing a set of values
and policies, only to watch
as he then proceeds to do the opposite"
"The Atlantic's Conor
Friedersdorf added that
Obama "has a long record
of broken promises and
misleading rhetoric
on civil liberties"
ACLU's executive director
Anthony Romero... noted,
"the president still claims
broad authority to
carry out targeted killings
far from any battlefield,
and there is still
insufficient transparency."
McClatchy's Leslie Clark and Jonathan Landay
astutely noted that Obama's formulation for
when drone strikes should be used was broader
than past government statements which meant he
"appeared to be laying groundwork for an expansion
of the controversial targeted killings"
...his speech had something for everyone, which
is another way of saying that it offered nothing
definitive or even reliable about future actions.
No matter how good it made some eager-to-believe
progressives feel, it's impossible rationally to assess
Obama's future posture regarding the war on terror,
secrecy and civil liberties except by his actions.
Until one sees actual changes in behavior and substance
on those issues, cheering for those changes as though
they already occurred or are guaranteed is the height
of self-delusion."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/27/obama-war-on-terror-
speech
Obama's terrorism speech: seeing what you want to see
Glenn Greenwald: See More
http://peaceresources.blogspot.com/PeaceResource.org
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think!